Why Were Raw Diets Banned From Delta Society??

Raw Diets Banned for Therapy Dogs!

The big news that has a lot of dog owners talking and even up in arms right now (especially dog owners who feed a raw diet to their therapy dogs) is that the Delta Society put out a shocking statement regarding a new policy prohibiting animals fed raw meat or raw animal products from participating in their Pet Partners program. http://www.deltasociety.org/Page.aspx?pid=638

This policy was established because of “research indicating dogs fed raw meat are much more likely to be shedding harmful bacteria like Salmonella and drug resistant E. coli in their feces compared to dogs fed commercial or home cooked diets, and the fact that these dogs come into close and frequent contact with people who are more susceptible to infections and at increased risk having severe infections.”

The Delta Society is large national charity that trains and registers therapy animals and organizes pet visitations to the sick and elderly.

Now, please let it be understood that their decision is based on (extremely limited) research showing pets consuming a raw meat diet could/may shed risky bacteria such as salmonella (in their feces). However, they have no evidence what so ever to prove that any pet fed a raw diet has ever sickened anyone, ever!

As fellow pet blogger pointed out, the answer as to how and why the Delta society could make such a policy, banning raw fed dogs and cats from being part of their program could very well lie on this page of the Delta Society website – the listing of Board of Directors http://www.deltasociety.org/Page.aspx?pid=252

Listed there, as Secretary for the charity is Brenda Bax; Marketing Director, Purina.

So, you have to wonder, is it possible that Purina Pet Food influenced The Delta Society’s move to ban pets fed raw meat.

Please read and consider the following letter sent to Delta Society from one educated person:

“Dear Delta Society,

While checking http://www.google.com to investigate your claims of raw protein causing a significant shed of pathogens in the dog’s stool, I found the largest amount of information on an internet search shows that dry dog food/processed pet food is the biggest offender of carrying salmonella contamination:

http://www.webmd.com/news/20080915/ salmonella-risk-prompts-pet-food-recall

One expert thinks contamination of pet food is likely to become more commonplace.

“There have been problems with pet foods before,” said Dr. Pascal James Imperato, chairman of the department of preventive medicine http://health.usnews.com/health-news/family-health/articles/2008/05/15/salmonella-outbreak-linked-to-dry-dog-food.html?PageNr=1 said community health at the State University of New York Downstate Medical
Center in New York City. “If the food had any animal product in it, there could have been contamination, or if it was being processed in a plant where they were also processing animal product, then contamination can easily occur,” he said. “There is greater industrialization of the production of food products, both for humans and animals, and these are complex processing systems. Therefore, there is greater opportunity for contamination,” Imperato said. “We are likely to see many more of these problems.”

Secondly, a large percentage of all dogs carry salmonella, regardless of diet. This has been known for some time:

Animal-to-Human — Salmonella can be acquired directly from pets (e.g. cats and dogs), reptiles, and birds. The feces of pets, especially those with diarrhea, contain Salmonella and humans can become infected if they do not wash their hands after contact with pets or pet feces.15

The pets may suffer Salmonellosis as a reverse zoonosis, with infection transmitted from human-to-pet and subsequently back to other humans. Salmonella can also be found in healthy dogs and cats at rates of up to 36 percent and 18 percent, respectively.52


Here’s what the Merck Veterinary Manual says about Salmonella in pets:

“Many dogs and cats are asymptomatic carriers of Salmonellae. Clinical disease is uncommon, but when it is seen, it is often associated with hospitalization, another infection or debilitating condition in adults, or exposure to large numbers of the bacteria in puppies and kittens.” 2

To translate: Many dogs and cats carry Salmonella in their systems (as evidenced by the presence of Salmonella in their feces), but they rarely become ill. It is just a natural part of what lives in their GI systems. When illness does occur it is usually associated with an already ill animal who is already immune-compromised. Illness may also occur when young animals
are exposed to very high numbers of the bacteria. This might happen if a puppy finds and licks the inside of an outdoor garbage can that has never been washed and is teeming with bacteria.

Research indicates that approximately 36 percent of healthy dogs and 17 percent of healthy cats carry Salmonella in their digestive tract.3   The American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) agrees with these numbers.4

It is interesting to note that these numbers are based on kibble-fed dogs-which means that Salmonella is a natural part of life for our pets regardless of what they are eating.

The resistance to illness in dogs from Salmonella is apparent in a study of raw-fed dogs in Canada. In that study 16 dogs were deliberately fed commercial raw diets pre-contaminated with Salmonella. None of those 16 dogs became ill. Additionally, only 7 of those 16 dogs shed Salmonella in their feces.5  While it was not further studied, one might speculate that the 9 dogs who ate Salmonella-contaminated food but did not shed it in their feces effectively neutralized the bacteria.

Even the FDA, in the FDA Consumer magazine, acknowledges that healthy pets rarely become ill from Salmonella contamination.6

2. http://www.merckvetmanual.com/mvm/index.jsp?cfle=htm/bc/20900.htm
3. Hand, M.S., Thatcher, C.D., Remillard, R.L., and Roudebush, P. (2000)
Small Animal Clinical Nutrition. Mark Morris Institute. Pg. 36-42,188.
4. http://www.avma.org/reference/zoonosis/znsalmonellosis.asp
5. Finley, R., et al. (2007) The Risk of Salmonellae Shedding by Dogs Fed
Salmonella-contaminated Commercial Raw Food Diets. Can Vet J. Vol 48 #1. Pg. 69-75.
6. http://www.fda.gov/FDAC/departs/2000/500_upd.html#pigs

It is also interesting to note that humans can transmit salmonella to dogs:

Dogs and cats may suffer salmonellosis as a “reverse zoonosis,” with infection transmitted from human-to-dog and subsequently back to other humans. Similarly, outbreaks of Salmonella infections in large animal teaching hospitals have been linked to the introduction of bacteria from infected human personnel, with subsequent spread to animals and then back to other human workers.

In one of the studies quoted on your website as part of your proof, in the first article only ten dogs were used to test for salmonella. The authors themselves state: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC339295/ Although these results are suggestive, they are not statistically significant owing to the small number of dogs studied. Larger numbers of dogs or multiple stool samples from each dog might have allowed the results to reach statistical significance. Unfortunately, the limited funding to this private clinic for this study did not allow for the inclusion of more study animals or multiple cultures from individual subjects.

And, in another study: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1716752/
Since this study was an experimental trial with laboratory beagles, results may not be completely indicative of what would be experienced with owned dogs of various breeds. Determining that the raw food diet was the main source of salmonellae shedding in owned dogs would be more complicated, as they could be exposed to several other possible sources of salmonellae, including other animals; other food items, including treats; the environment; and their owners.


And information from our friends in Canada again: “This is slide show that has been prepared to show the dangers of raw fed foods for therapy dogs has done a great job of skewing the results. They show the high incidence of bacteria found in 40 raw fed dogs stools, but somehow tend to downplay the amounts found in dogs fed a dry diet. This study shows:

Raw fed dogs (40)  Dry food fed dogs (156)

Raw fed – 0 – for Vanomycin resistant enterococci               Kibble fed -1 – for Vanomycin resistant enterococci

Raw fed – 1 for Methicillin resistant S Aureus                        Kibble fed – 8 – for Methicillin resistant S Aureus

Raw fed – 5 for Clostridium difficile                                         Kibble fed – 40 -for Clostridium difficile

Raw fed – 19 for Salmonella                                                       Kibble fed 12 -for salmonella

Raw fed – 31 for E Coli                                                                Kibble fed – 32 – for E Coli

While this study may show more Salmonella and E Coli in raw fed dogs (which I personally don’t believe to be true) , it does show higher results for the bacteria Clostridium, Methicillin resistant S Aureus and has Vanomycin resistant enterococci. And the amount of Salmonella and E Coli, while not as high as raw fed dogs, is still significant.

My conclusion is that, in your hurry to label the raw diet as the culprit, and eliminate its use from your volunteers in your program, you are only putting the spotlight on the issue that all dogs can carry pathogens regardless of diet . This could cause all dogs to be banned from use in any health facility. In essence, I see your new rule as ‘shooting yourself in the foot’. I feel in your confidence and your bias of proving a raw diet could spread pathogens, you forgot to do a full research on the issue. Salmonella is everywhere, including dry dog food, the soil, pond water and even from humans. Understand you are looking at narrow parameters that need a more careful and extensive study on how pathogens are spread and how to use sensible and effective prevention.

I don’t see a problem with allowing dogs into nursing homes, hospitals or hospices, as long as good hygiene is applied. That would include bathing the dogs, insuring therapy dogs are flea and tick free, making sure the dog’s are properly exercised (ie pottied) before a visit, and carrying sterilization equipment (bleach, bags and paper towels) in case of an accident. All research points out pathogens are spread by stool or saliva. That would mean not allowing the dogs to lick the clients, making sure the coats and skin are recently bathed and trusting your volunteers. Your volunteers are the backbone of your organization, and they do this loving volunteer work without compensation and give the Delta group thousands of volunteer hours. I hope you take this email in the light it was written, in that sometimes, we need to look at any situation with more study and thought, and understand the healing, joy and encouragement dogs give so many people. Being a patient with serious illness and being away from home often stifles recovery. Pets, as you know, bring hope, happiness and support to begin the process of healing.

I hope you rethink your position on this matter, and continue to allow your therapy dog work to bring joy to both your clients and your volunteers. My interest in researching this and writing to you is in memory to my Ch Blackwood Dante V Lyvngwerth CD and Ch Bourbon’s Bravo of Blackwood, two Rottweilers I owned who were the recipients of the American Rottweiler Club TRUE award, for their many hours of therapy work. And yes, they both were fed a raw diet. They both worked in the intensive care units of hospitals in Tyler, Texas, for many years.”

Lew Olson PhD Natural Health
Author of, “Raw and Natural Diets for Dogs”


So, could it be that this ban of raw meat pet food was initiated/motivated by a board member Purina executive?  It sure does make you wonder doesn’t it?

This move also has to make you wonder if other such bans or reverse endorsements (not an official pet food brand endorsement, but a back-handed endorsement of commercial pet food in general) will be seen from other charities or pet organizations that accept large donations from Big Pet Food?

It sure makes me wonder if the multi-billion dollar Pet Food industry is now scrambling, possibly trying to hold on to their ever slacking control of the pet food market!  After all, the more educated pet owners become; the less pet foods are purchased. This is a very exciting thought – that just maybe we are making more headway in education on the benefits of a raw diet and natural health than we at first thought.

You may be interested in the article Dr. Jeannie co-authored with Dr. Kim Bloomer – Salmonella – the bad bacteria

Interested in learning more about the benefits of a raw diet for your dogs?  The American Council of Animal Naturopathy not only has a pet owners class – Holistic Wellness For Dogs  but they offer certification courses in Carnivore Nutrition as well.

1 Comment

  1. […] in response to Delta Society's not allowing Raw Fed dogs to be therapy dogs it has TONS of links: Why Were Raw Diets Banned From Delta Society?? : Whole Dog News __________________ Heather Rawfeeding My Little Carnivores since July […]

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: